Good Luck reversing Obama’s Cuba policies

 

Big business won’t allow it.

 

James Bruno, on Politico

 

On Tuesday, the White House announced its intention to remove Cuba from the U.S. government’s list of nations that sponsor terrorism. This news is in keeping with the Obama administration’s normalization of relations with Cuba -an effort strongly supported by the U.S. business community and a growing number of Cuban-Americans but vigorously opposed by Republicans on the campaign trail.

 

For the first time perhaps in 50 years, Cuba, after Iran, portends to be a dominant and contentious foreign policy issue in the 2016 presidential campaign. But, unlike the 1960s, two Republican politicians of Cuban ancestry hold center stage in the race. Texas Sen. Ted Cruz is the son of a Cuban exile father. Florida Sen. Marco Rubio, who threw his hat in the ring earlier this week, has Cuban parents who settled in the U.S. before Fidel Castro seized power. Both candidates adamantly oppose normalization on Obama’s terms.

 

Rubio has condemned President Obama’s Cuba initiative as a “concession to a tyranny.” In taking a hardline stance, Rubio, 43, is out of sync with his generation of Cuban-Americans. A 2014 poll by Florida International University of Cuban-Americans in Miami showed that 78 percent of those aged 33 to 44 favor restoring diplomatic relations and 45 percent are for lifting the embargo. In response to such numbers, Rubio remarked, “I don’t care if the polls say that 99 percent of people believe we should normalize relations in Cuba…This is my position, and I feel passionately about it.”

 

Ted Cruz echoed Rubio’s denunciation of Obama’s move, saying, “America is, in effect, writing the check that will allow the Castro’s to follow Vladimir Putin’s playbook of repression.”

 

Rubio has said he would seek to block the appointment of a U.S. ambassador to Cuba and funding for a new embassy. Beyond that, neither he nor Cruz have laid out a plan of action to deal with the White House’s rapprochement with Havana.

 

Entertaining for a moment a President Cruz or a President Rubio in the Oval Office, what could either realistically do once the genie is out of the bottle, assuming Obama succeeds in restoring full relations, abolishing travel restrictions and ending the embargo? Once relations have normalized, the business community, eager to enter an emerging market close to their shores and long denied them, will fight the return to the former status quo. Big bucks are being mobilized by Big Business in a concerted effort to change politicians’ minds on Cuba policy. And political shifts within Congress are resulting in the removal of old barriers.

 

Sen. Robert Menendez’s decision to step down as ranking member on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee in the face of corruption charges sidelines a major obstacle to moving ahead with normalization. The 61-year-old Cuban-American Democrat from New Jersey is adamantly opposed to granting concessions to the Castro regime in return for full diplomatic and trade relations. His replacement as ranking member is Maryland Sen. Ben Cardin, a moderate centrist. His spokesman told me, “Senator Cardin believes we should continue to push Cuba on their human rights record but the recent diplomatic changes are positive.”

 

Cardin has signed on as a co-sponsor to Sen. Jeff Flake’s (R-Ariz.) travel bill, which would end all travel restrictions for Americans who wish to visit Cuba. Committee chairman, Tennessee Republican Bob Corker, has promised to hold “robust hearings” on the president’s Cuba initiative, but has also gone on record declaring the embargo ineffective.

 

Outside of the political realm, key players in the U.S. business community with an interest in Cuba are coming into alignment toward normalization. The April 1st Cuba Opportunity Summit sold out early, with 100 waitlisted, a clear indication of corporate enthusiasm. At the event, some 250 CEOs and other senior business leaders convened at NASDAQ’s Times Square headquarters to “formulate a strategic roadmap for entry into the [Cuban] market,” according to the conference’s sponsor, the University of Pennsylvania. The Cuban-American CEO of Norwegian Cruise Lines, Frank del Rio, told CNBC, “We’ve got to get past this acrimony about Cuba. It’s time to move on.” He added that a healing process is needed to “bring relations between our two countries back to where they should be.” A follow-up business summit will be held in Havana later this year.

 

The big roadblock to normal economic relations is the U.S. embargo, in place since the Eisenhower administration. Lifting it requires congressional legislation, which Republicans, who currently control both houses, have so far opposed. But there is movement within corporate circles to change that. A Cuba Opportunity Summit organizer told me that “a lot of those discussions -lobbying Congress- are going on. They [CEOs] are discussing strategies.”

 

U.S. agribusiness is already pressing for greater access to Cuban markets. In January of this year, over 30 companies and farm trade associations, ranging from the multinational conglomerate Cargill to the Dairy Farmers of America, formed the U.S. Agriculture Coalition for Cuba, dedicated to the immediate end of the trade embargo. Cuba, which imports 80 percent of its food, is a $1.7 billion market for agricultural products. U.S. farm exports to Cuba in 2014 amounted to over $290 million under no-credit, cash-only trade rules allowed by U.S. law. Missouri governor Jay Nixon called the opening up of Cuba “a tremendous opportunity to strengthen our farms and our economy.” Other Republican politicians can be expected to echo this call as heartland farm interests press their case.

 

Opposition to normalization, however, remains strong among many Cuban-Americans. The three Cuban-American U.S. Senators and four Cuban-American House members are on record opposing President Obama’s normalization initiative. This opposition reaches into the ranks of Cuban-Americans holding elective office at the state level as well. The New Jersey and Florida state legislatures recently passed symbolic resolutions against normalization. Mauricio Claver-Carone, a 39-year old Cuban-American activist who serves on the board of the U.S.-Cuba Democracy PAC, which purports to be the largest Hispanic political action committee, asserted to me that “there is no light between Cuban-American politicians at any level of government” regarding U.S. Cuba policy, irrespective of party affiliation. He criticized those business interests pressing for opening with Havana as driven by “money first, democracy later.”

 

Claver-Carone cited a Republican-affiliated poll taken in March which showed 54 percent of Cuban-Americans opposing normalization versus 41 percent in support; and 71 percent against lifting sanctions in contrast to 20 percent in favor. But two recent surveys conducted by independent pollster Bendixen & Amandi International painted a different picture. Those surveys found Cuban-American support for normalization surging from 44 percent last December to 51 percent this March. Furthermore, according to Bendixen & Amandi, Cuban-Americans in favor of continuing the U.S. trade embargo dropped from 40 percent to 36 percent and support for easing travel restrictions rose from 47 percent to 56 percent.

 

The Cuban American National Foundation was a powerful force on Cuba policy in years past, holding great sway on the Hill as well as with mainly Republican presidents. Its founder, the late Jorge Mas Canosa, was considered the principal architect behind a U.S. policy of incrementally tightening the screws on Fidel Castro, culminating in the 1996 Helms-Burton Act, which expanded the embargo’s reach to include foreign-owned companies that traded with Cuba. But the foundation’s hardline position has softened. Its current president, Bay of Pigs invasion veteran and POW Francisco José Hernández, told me, “We welcome opening talks with the Cuban government.” The 600,000 Cubans who have arrived in the United States since 1995, he said, “want to build bridges.” He cited a generational change as underlying the shift toward normalization. CANF, however, supports lifting the embargo only after firm concessions are secured from Havana in the area of human rights.

 

If the Obama administration were able to end the embargo with Cuba, Republicans like Cruz and Rubio would undoubtedly denounce it. But they might not be able to do much about it. Would a Republican president close our new embassy in Havana and Cuba’s in Washington? Re-impose travel limitations and the trade embargo? Such a scenario is highly unrealistic. The U.S. has backtracked on no similar policy in the past. Add to that the changing views within the Cuban-American community, as well as among other Americans, and the picture that is emerging is one of inevitability.

 

The opinions and characterizations in this article are those of the author, and do not necessarily represent official positions of the United States Government.

 

 

Cubanálisis - El Think-Tank

IN ENGLISH LANGUAGE

FOR PEOPLE WHO READ IN ENGLISH: ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS IN ENGLISH  OR TRANSLATED. PUBLICATION DOES NOT MEAN WE ENDORSE OR REJECT CONCLUSIONS OR STATEMENTS OF AUTHORS