Brian Latell, The Latell Report
But increasingly the leading next-generation contender is Alejandro Castro Espin. Born in 1965, the only son of Raul Castro and Vilma Espin, his claim to inherited prominence is incomparable. His mother, was Cuba’s de facto first lady and head of the women’s federation until her death in 2007. Tough and smart, for a period a communist party politburo member, she formed an enduring alliance with Raul.
Their son -in contrast to Fidel’s numerous male heirs- has been groomed for leadership roles. An Angola war veteran, Alejandro lost an eye in a non-combat accident in 1986. At the University of Havana he studied engineering but switched to international relations, earning an advanced degree after completing a dissertation and publishing articles. His book, Imperio del Terror, derived from them. It is a brooding, 300 page anti-American screed that he is said to have researched for about a decade.
A ministry of interior colonel Alejandro has responsibility for coordinating policy between the intelligence and security services and the armed forces. With a thickening resume as hard line scholar, itinerant regime spokesman, and close ally of his father, he is expected to be promoted to brigadier general, possibly later this year.
Alejandro’s ascent has been rapid, but only since his father became president in 2008. It was a year later with the publication of his book that he initially gained attention. It catalogues fifty years of what he describes as American terrorism and aggression against Cuba.
In the dedication, for example, he singles out “the 3,478 compatriots who perished and the 2,099 others physically incapacitated as a result of state terrorism practiced against Cuba by American governments.”
Recently issued in a new edition, and translated into several foreign languages, the book has received scant publicity in the official Cuban media. But Alejandro has hawked it aggressively abroad. In Moscow in October 2012 he promoted the Russian translation, and in January made multiple public appearances in Greece, discussing the Greek translation.
In Athens he was interviewed for local television at the foot of the Acropolis. Sounding more like his uncle Fidel than his father, he answered a few questions in endless monologues and with robust self-confidence. In another interview he denied any interest in succeeding his father, while failing, however, to mention Miguel Diaz-Canel, the first vice president Raul has tapped to succeed him in early 2018.
In January Alejandro also traveled, with Raul, to Costa Rica for a conclave of Latin American and Caribbean leaders, presumably interacting with many of them. A month later he led a Cuban delegation to Moscow where he signed a joint defense agreement.
Alejandro’s ascendancy begs a number of questions, all more relevant now as Cuba and the United States pursue normalized relations. Does his anti-American brief faithfully reflect his father’s thinking? Is the scion being used by Raul and regime hardliners to help delineate a tough negotiating stance? The aggressive speech Raul delivered in Costa Rica suggests it may be both.
A former Cuban official now in exile knew the son during his university days. Alejandro was actually “disinterested in politics” then, “a normal, quiet student.” Married in the mid-1980s, he honeymooned in Leningrad around the time of Mikhail Gorbachev’s ascent to power. Like his father, and probably guided by him, he seems to have gravitated in his youth toward Soviet Marxism and Russia.
But is Colonel Castro sufficiently talented and versatile to lead Cuba after his father is gone? Would he have the support of key elites, especially in the uniformed services and communist party?
I asked the former official who knew him to comment. He said he does not expect Alejandro to rise much higher in the hierarchy: “to one star general, yes; but not to the politburo.”
In televised appearances in Athens, and an earlier one in Moscow, Alejandro was forceful but scripted. In more than 30 minutes of pontificating at the Acropolis he gave no hints of humor, nuance, wit, or intellectual agility. He was mechanical, parroting propaganda bits he seemed to have memorized. He spoke like a mid-twentieth century Marxist didact.
The son of a now deceased hero of the revolution also knew Alejandro well in Cuba. He has written from exile that “many in the military hate him, others criticize him, and others mock him.” If so, Cuba’s dauphin could have poor prospects once Raul is unable to protect him from more astute rivals.
IN ENGLISH LANGUAGE
FOR PEOPLE WHO READ IN ENGLISH: ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS IN ENGLISH OR TRANSLATED. PUBLICATION DOES NOT MEAN WE ENDORSE OR REJECT CONCLUSIONS OR STATEMENTS OF AUTHORS